Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion labels’ criteria
From: Text mining and topic modeling insights on fish welfare and antimicrobial use in aquaculture
Inclusion criteria (labels) | Reasons |
|---|---|
Welfare | Reports relating to fishes’ welfare in aquaculture |
Aquaculture technologies | Reports relating to any aspects on welfare/antibiotic resistance linked to aquaculture technologies |
Antibiotic resistance | Reports on antibiotic resistance in aquaculture |
Ethics on the topic | Reports on ethics aspects on the topic |
Legislation | Legislation about aquaculture, fish farming, welfare, and antimicrobics’ use in aquaculture) |
Proposed alternative to AR | Reports that indicate alternative solutions to antibiotic resistance |
Exclusion criteria (labels) | Reasons |
Other/many species | Other species than fishes or other aspect not relating on aquaculture, welfare, legislation, antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial use. |
Disease, drugs, vaccines | All articles about viral, bacterial, parasitic, or fungal diseases that no interesting antibiotic resistance |
Humans | Articles related to human perceptions, structured from a human point of view, or on animal abuse or on relinquishment reasons, animal hoarding |
Generic Welfare | Generic protocols to assess stress and welfare on pets or to reduce/improve them, generic welfare legislation, fishes' welfare related to other phases of production such as transport, slaughter, etc. |
Others | Articles on drugs’ pharmacokinetics, toxic, genetics, effectiveness, side/adverse effects, flower extracts, essential oils, others fishes' aspects, biofilm, behaviour not related to welfare, others substances with antimicrobial effects, withdrawal, fishery export refusals time, diet. |