Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of selected studies with comparators that report productivity impact (weight and egg production losses)

From: Economic impact of chicken diseases and other causes of morbidity or mortality in backyard farms in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cause

Pathogen (s)/cause

Number of chickens

Productivity gain

Yield reduction (%)

Reference

Uninfected or treated chickens

Infected chickens

Parasite

Ascaridia galli,

Heterakis gallinarum,

cestodes

68 treated, 65 untreated

65.1 g per week

58.4 g per week

10.3b

[33]

Parasite

A.galli,

H.gallinarum,

Raillietina tetragona, R. cesticillus, R. echonobothrida, Amoebotaenia cuneata, Capillaria spp, Cheilospirura hamulosa

50 treated, 50 untreated

125.3 g per week

95.8 g per week

23.8a

[34]

Parasite

A.galli, H. gallinarum, Cheilospirura hamulosa, R. tetragona, R. cesticillus, R. echonobothrida, Hymenolepis spp, Echinostomatidae

40 treated, 74 untreated

2090 g total liveweight at the end cycle (~ 18 weeks)

1990 g total liveweight at the end cycle (~ 18 weeks)

4.8c

[35]

Parasite

Eimeria spp

10 treated, 10 untreated

99.8% weight gain

58% weight gain

41.8 c

[36]

Parasite

Ascaridia galli

before (n = 800)/ after (n = 600)

36.5% hens lay eggs

0% hens lay eggs

100c

[37]

Nutritional

Vitamin A deficiency

300 treated, 300 untreated

91 ± 8 g per week

53 ± 17 g per week

41.8a

[38]

Virus

Infectious bursal disease virus

1618 vaccinated,

1337 untreated

38.0 g per week

22.0 g per week

42.1a

[39]

  1. Level of significance estimated in the study
  2. a statistically significant
  3. bnon-statistically significant
  4. clevel of significance not estimated