Skip to main content

Elucidation of collagen content in different anatomical regions of the dermis of donkeys (Equus asinus): histomorphometric and ultrastructural study

Abstract

Research on collagen content in donkey skin is limited, necessitating experimental approaches to aid in the economic production of the leather and cosmetics industries. This study aimed to analyze the histomorphometry and ultrastructure of donkey skin and compare collagen fiber zones in various anatomical regions, both objectively and quantitatively. The study was the first to describe the melanosome number in different skin regions of a donkey. Skin biopsies from fourteen mature male donkeys were used in this study. The epidermis and dermis were examined histologically and ultrastructurally, focusing on the dermo-epidermal thickness ratio and collagen bundle arrangement in the dermis. The study revealed that melanin deposits are higher in the limbs and abdomen of donkeys compared to the back, neck, and thorax, and the dermal-epidermal junction of the back skin is longer. The back skin is the thickest, while the limb skin is the thinnest, despite the high collagen content in the thoracic region. The study indicates that the variation in melanin deposits and dermal-epidermal junction lengths in different body regions of donkeys may be due to variations in mechanical stress and environmental factors. The abdomen had the highest melanocyte count, with significant differences compared to the neck, back, and thorax. The neck region had the lowest count, while the limb, back, and thorax had similar counts. The study’s findings could aid in identifying the difference between normal skin features and collagen-diseased skin in donkeys, aiding in diagnosis and providing valuable insights for veterinarians and researchers studying similar conditions.

Highlights

Our study aims to understand the histological composition and collagen content of donkey skin in various anatomical regions like the chest, abdomen, back, and limbs. The study aims to identify areas of donkey skin suitable for use in the leather and cosmetics industries. Different areas of donkey skin were studied using light and electron microscopy, and we statistically found that the highest amount of collagen is found in the skin of the chest. The histomorphometric features of the donkey’s skin offer additional dermatological evaluation and valuable tools for assessing skin lesions.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Donkeys, domesticated members of the Equidae, were used as working animals, particularly in underdeveloped countries, for draft and riding purposes in rural areas. The largest number of donkeys lives in developing countries. An anticipated 59 million donkeys as well as mules exist worldwide [1]. The donkey, a common domestic livestock animal, was used for farming and providing sustenance in certain communities due to its economical transportation status [2, 3]. In 2014, Egypt had 3.2 million donkey heads, but now it’s only one million. This decline is attributed to the Chinese market’s demand for donkey hides, overexploitation of hides, and industrialization, as well as the growing demand for Egyptian donkeys for preparation and industrialization [4,5,6].

The skin, constituting about 16% of the body mass, serves as the first barrier between the body and its environment, protecting and maintaining homeostasis [7,8,9]. Szczepanik, et al. [10] asserted that the strong skin tear resistance during technological processing is facilitated by the proper dermal and epidermal structure, as well as subcutaneous tissue. Skin histomorphometry measures the thickness of skin layers, collagen and elastic fiber bundles, and skin accessories like sweat glands, sebaceous glands, and hair follicles. This quantitative evaluation provides specific physiological functions for donkeys to adapt to environmental changes [11] and defines the quality of their skin [12]. Colla corii asini (E′jiao, A’jiao) was created using the skin of Equus asinus L. as the primary raw material. A gelatin-like block-shaped preparation called Colla corii asini yielded 58 compounds, mostly proteins, amino acids, polysaccharides, gelatins, inorganic substances, volatile substances, and so on [13].

Collagen is a fibrous, insoluble protein present in the skin and other tissues of the body in all species. In industry, collagen has been widely used for the production of gelatin, especially in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [14]. The texture of skin is ensured by collagen, and as we age, our bodies produce less collagen annually by 1–2%, starting at age thirty [15]. Also, different collagen phenotypic characteristics of body and limb skin can reflect dissimilarities in healing patterns [16], so there is a persistent need for collagen evaluation and quantification [17].

There is currently very little scientific information about donkey skin in research, emphasizing the need to create a fundamental structure, determine collagen distribution, and establish quantifiable information that might be valuable to E′jiao manufacture. Additionally, this study describes the histomorphometry aspects of a donkey’s skin that provide additional dermatological evaluation and useful tools for assessing the skin lesions. Understanding the histomorphometry aspects of a donkey’s skin can contribute to a better elucidation of its structure and potential applications in the field of dermatology. Furthermore, this research can provide valuable insights into the development of treatments for skin lesions in donkeys and potentially other animals with similar skin characteristics.

Material & methods

Animals and samples

This study was carried out at the Anatomy and Embryology Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Egypt. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Benha University and the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines in Egypt (Ethical No. BUFVTM 12-02-22) accepted all procedures used in this study. Skin samples from 14 adult donkeys (125–135 kg), client-owned and euthanized for unrelated reasons, were collected for this study. The examined skin samples were collected from donkeys during fall and winter 2020 with no history of skin injuries, disorders, or abnormalities. During mid-morning, the skin samples were immediately obtained once each donkey had been euthanized. The skin locations were clipped and treated with chlorhexidine digluconate, 2% germicide, and a 0.5% alcoholic solution. Each skin specimen underwent a thorough dissection to expose the subcutaneous fat layer beneath. Skin samples’ size was 2 × 2 cm for histological examination and 0.5 × 0.5 cm for electron microscopy (TEM). Skin specimens were taken from five various parts of the donkey’s cadaver (neck, thorax, back, caudal abdomen, and limb).

Light microscopic studies

The skin tissue samples (0.5 cm3) were immediately well-kept in 10% formalin (neutral buffered) to be fixed and prepared for the different histological techniques [18]. After 24 h, the samples were extensively transferred to 70% alcohol. The tissue samples were then dehydrated in an ascending grade of ethanol, cleared in xylene, and impregnated and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 5 μm were cut using a Leica rotatory microtome (RM 20352035; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and mounted on glass slides. Paraffin sections were prepared according to the protocol of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining [18, 19] for general histology. For collagen and muscle fiber staining, Masson’s trichrome [20, 21] was used. The sections were examined and photographed under a bright field light microscope (Olympus BX 50 compound microscope).

Transmission electron microscopy

The skin was prepared for TEM examinations, according to Kandyel, et al. [22]. Skin specimens were fixed for four days at 4 °C in a combination of 2.5% paraformaldehyde - glutaraldehyde solutions. The specimens (each about 1 mm3) were first fixed by submersion in a solution containing 5% glutaraldehyde and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. Subsequently, they were fixed by rinsing in a solution containing 1% osmium tetroxide and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. The samples underwent 15 min of dehydration in escalating ethanol grades of 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100%. The dehydrated samples were then soaked in epoxy resin for one hour at 40 °C. For light microscopy, the semithin sections with 1 μm thickness were prepared and stained with 1% toluidine blue. Next, for electron microscopy, 60 nm ultra-thin sections were made and stained with uranyl acetate, followed by lead citrate. The stained ultra-thin sections were investigated by using a transmission electron microscope (JEOL 1010) at the electron microscopy unit, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Morphometric measurements

Quantitative measurements were done using Leica’s morphometric software suite version 4.0 (LAS V4.0). For every animal, 5 random sections stained with H&E were investigated with a 10× objective lens. Quantitative analysis included measurements of both epidermal and dermal thickness as well as the distance of the dermo-epidermal junction. Using computer software, a line was drawn along the dermal epidermal interface to determine its extent. In addition to those measurements, the quantity of sebaceous glands, hair follicles, sweat glands, arrector pili muscles, and collagen contents in the dermis was calculated for each slide, and the dermis area was measured, and these data were presented as the mean number per mm2. Images were captured at five different magnifications: four, ten, twenty, forty, and one hundred. At all magnifications, qualitative elucidation of tissue architecture and cell morphology was carried out. All measurements were done using ImageJ software [23].

Statistical analysis

To display the results, the means and standard errors of the mean (TEM) were calculated. The results were calculated using a T-test, ordinary one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed data, and ANOVA on rank for non-normally distributed data at P 0.05, the acquired data were deemed statistically significant. The data was analyzed with GraphPad Prism 9 software, and the results were displayed as means ± histology. The mean thickness (µm) of epidermis and dermis; length of dermo-epidermal interface (µm), and Number of hair follicle muscles/mm2, sebaceous gland clusters/mm2, sweat gland clusters/mm2, and arrector pili muscles/mm2; Content of collagen.

Results

Light microscopic findings

Epidermis

There were four layers in the thin epidermis of every anatomical region, including the neck, back, thorax, abdomen, and limb, namely the stratum basale, stratum spinosum, stratum granulosum, and stratum corneum. The stratum basale of the epidermis was characterized by cuboidal or low columnar cells with ovoid or round nuclei resting on a wavy basement membrane. It was also observed that there were several layers of large polyhedral cells in the stratum spinosum. Moreover, the stratum granulosum contained two to three layers of flattened squamous cells. In addition, it was found that the outer layer was the stratum corneum (horny layer), as described in (Fig. 1). Melanocytes were observed in low numbers within the stratum basale of the back, neck, and thorax regions and in high numbers in the abdomen and limb regions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Photomicrograph of Equus asinus skin showing normal histological structure of the abdominal region with serrated dermo-epidermal junction (black arrowhead) in (View A), the back region with melanocytes with a low number (red arrowhead) in (View B), the limb region with its flattened dermo-epidermal junction (black arrowhead) in (View C), the neck region with melanocytes and a low number (red arrowhead) in (View D), and the thorax region with melanocytes with a low number (red arrowhead) in (View E). Abbreviations: epidermis (Ep), dermis (DE), papillary dermis (P), reticular dermis (R), stratum corneum (F), stratum granulosum (M), stratum spinosum (N), and stratum basale (R). Masson trichrome stain; bar indicates magnification

Basal cells in the epidermal part atop the apices of the dermal papillae gave rise to various villous cytoplasmic protrusions in the dermis, giving rise to a serrated appearance in the abdomen, back, and neck regions. These prominent, tiny foot-like protrusions or processes created a greatly tortuous dermo-epidermal junction. However, the basal cells of the skin of the limbs lost these protrusions, giving a flattened dermo-epidermal junction (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Photomicrograph of Equus asinus skin showing normal histological structure of the abdominal region (View A), the back region (View B), the limb region (View C), the neck region (View D), and the thoracic region (View E). Abbreviations: epidermis (Ep), dermis (DE), hair follicle (HF), sweat gland (SG), sebaceous gland (BG), a black arrow indicated a dermo-epidermal junction, a black arrowhead indicated epidermal pillars, and a black star indicated dermal papillae. H&E stain; bar indicates magnification

The epidermal part at the top apices of the dermal papillae gave rise to various villous protrusions in the dermis, giving rise to a serrated appearance in the abdomen, back, and neck regions. These prominent, tiny foot-like protrusions or processes created a greatly tortuous dermo-epidermal junction. However, the epidermis of the skin of the limbs lost these protrusions, giving a flattened dermo-epidermal junction (Fig. 2).

Dermo-epidermal interface

It constituted support for epidermal cells; in all anatomical regions, the dermo-epidermal junction was wavy, with well-defined columns of dermis expanding in-between dermal papillae (Fig. 2).

Dermis

In all the areas of the skin, there were two layers of dermis: the outer narrow papillary vascular dermis and the wider inner reticular dermis. The use of Masson trichrome to stain the dermis allowed clear identification of a collagenous network. On the other hand, collagen fibers were of comparable size and distribution in all samples (Fig. 1).

The reticular layer of the dermis is home to skin appendages like sebaceous glands, hair follicles, sweat glands, and arrector pili muscles. In various anatomical regions, sebaceous glands with sacculations accompanied the oval-shaped hair follicles. Sebaceous glands were simple, branched, and showed a multi-bubble cytoplasm with central nuclei. Sweat glands were found in the core of the reticular dermis and were coiled tubular with a secretory low-cuboidal epithelium with acidophilic cytoplasm and round basally located nuclei. The arrector pili muscle began as a small bundle of smooth muscle near the epidermis and was later divided into as many branches at the sebaceous gland (Fig. 3A and C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photomicrograph of Equus asinus skin. (View A) showing skin appendages in different anatomical regions with H&E stain, (View B) with H&E stain, (View C) with Masson trichrome stain, (Views E and F) showing the orientation of collagen fibers in the third accessory layer (T) parallel to the epidermis cordovan layer (Cd) with H&E stain in (View E), and Masson trichrome stain in (View F). Abbreviations: epidermis (Ep), dermis (DE), arrector pilli muscle (AP), hair follicle (HF), sebaceous gland (SB), sweat gland (SG), papillary dermis (P), reticular dermis (R), hair follicle (HF), myoepithelial cells (red arrowhead), sebaceous gland cells (green arrowhead), multivacuolated cytoplasm (black arrowhead) with central nucleus, and blood vessels (Blvs)

It was observed that the dermis contains thin and thick collagen bundles in the papillary dermis and reticular dermis, respectively. The cordovan layer was detected under the reticular dermis, while collagen bundles appeared thicker and had an accessory layer (third layer) in the limbs only (Fig. 3). The accessory layer’s collagen fibers were aligned parallel to the epidermis.

Transmission electron microscopy

Epidermis

The stratum corneum presented a wavy appearance upon ultrastructural observation of the limb’s epidermis. The fundamental characteristics of the stratum granulosum include the presence of intracellular keratohyalin granules. Basal cells were distinguished by their cell membranes containing finger-like protrusions that extend into the dermis and form finger-like protrusions of basal cells. Moreover, the wavy dermo-epidermal junction was noticed (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Transmission electron micrograph of Equus asinus skin. (View A) shows the structure of the epidermis with wavy stratum corneum (Stc), granules of keratohyalin (red arrows), epidermis (EP), dermis (DE), and finger-like projections of basal cells (green arrowheads). (View B) shows the organization of collagen in the dermis (DE): papillary dermis (P), the epidermis (EP), reticular dermis (R), and dermal collagen sectioned transversely and longitudinally (white arrowheads); white stars indicate electron lucent spaces. (View C) shows the arrangement of collagen in the dermis (white arrows). (View D) showing the bundles of fine elastin microfibrils (red arrowheads) that were inserted between collagen bundles (CB)

Dermis

Collagen was arranged into dense masses oriented mainly parallel to the surface of the skin. Dermal collagen appears transversely and longitudinally cut into the dermis. The papillary dermis consisted of a “lacy-like” arrangement of fibers with prominent electron spaces between the fibrils, as the collagen appeared as a cluster of randomly distributed microfibrils and small bundles in the papillary dermis (Fig. 4B). Large undulating, loosely interwoven collagen bundles were found in the reticular dermis; these bundles were randomly oriented (Fig. 4C). On the other hand, the fibers within a particular bundle were densely packed together. Microfibrils of elastin were seen inserted between the collagen bundles (Fig. 4D).

Morphometric and statistical analysis of the measurements of skin

The epidermis thickness ranged from 37.3 to 100.2 μm. In the neck, thorax, and abdomen, the epidermal thickness ranged from 37.3 to 47.9 μm. While in the back and limb, the epidermis was relatively thick (100.2 ± 16.8 μm), as described in Table 1 and (Fig. 5A). It was found that the thickness of the skin in all five areas, which include the neck, back, chest, abdomen, and limbs, differs significantly (p = 0.003), as described in (Table 1) and (Fig. 5A).

Table 1 Measurements of different parameters (mean ± SE) of Donkey’s skin, including the epidermis thickness, the dermo-epidermal interface length, and dermal thickness, the collagen content of the dermis, the hair follicles’ number in the dermis, the sebaceous and sweat glands’ number in the skin, and the number of arrector pili muscles
Fig. 5
figure 5

Graph describing the measurements of different parameters (mean ± SE) of donkey’s skin, including the epidermis thickness (View A), the dermo-epidermal interface length (View B), dermal thickness (View C), the collagen content of the dermis (View D), the hair follicles’ number in the dermis (View E), the sebaceous and sweat glands’ number in the skin (View F-G), and the number of arrector pili muscles (View H)

The dermo-epidermal interface length varied from 1450.7 to 2037.3 μm. The length in the abdomen, neck, and thorax ranged from 1450.7 to 1531 μm. The back and limbs were relatively long (1656.9–2037.3 μm), as seen in (Table 1) and (Fig. 5B). The length of the dermo-epidermal junction varied significantly between the donkey’s various anatomical regions (p = 0.021).

The dermal thickness ranged from 2415.5 to 3414.8 μm. In the abdomen, thorax, and limb, the thickness ranged from 2415.5 to 2883.4 μm, while the back and neck were relatively thick (3005.1–3414.8 μm). It was noticed that the back was the thickest (3414.8 μm), as described in Table 1 and (Fig. 5C). The anatomical regions of the donkey differed significantly in terms of skin thickness (p = 0.011).

The collagen content of the dermis varies from 150.3 to 194.2 μm, and that in the abdomen, back, and neck ranged from 150.3 to 153.6 μm. The thorax and limb were relatively thick (164.9–194.2 μm), as shown in (Table 1) and (Fig. 5D). No great difference was noticed between the dermal content of collagen between the different anatomical regions (p = 0.2).

The hair follicles’ number in the dermis varied from 5.6 to 16.3. The quantity of hair follicles varied significantly amongst the donkey’s five regions (p = 0.014), as shown in (Table 1) and (Fig. 5E). The sebaceous glands’ number in the skin of the abdomen was lower than in other regions; however, the variations between the regions were not significant (p = 0.32) whereas there was a statistically significant difference in the quantity of sweat glands across the donkey’s five skin regions (p = 0.02), as shown in (Table 1) and (Fig. 5F-G). Regarding the number of Arrector pili muscles, it was 4 in the neck’s skin, while in the abdomen, it was 10, however, they were not statistically different between the five regions of the donkey (p = 0.43) as shown in (Table 1) and (Fig. 5H).

Statistical analysis of melanocyte in different skin regions

The statistical analysis of melanocytes in different skin regions, including the abdomen, limb, back, neck, and thorax. Abdomen is significantly higher than back, neck, and thorax (*). Abdomen was highly significantly higher than limb (*). The limb also showed a significant difference compared to the neck (**). (ns) is not significant; (*) was a significant difference at (typically p < 0.05). (*) and (**) are higher levels of significance (e.g., p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively), as described in (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Graph describing the statistical analysis of melanocytes in different skin regions, including the abdomen, limb, back, neck, and thorax. Abdomen is significantly higher than back, neck, and thorax (*). Abdomen is highly significantly higher than limb (*). The limb also shows a significant difference compared to the neck (**). (ns) is not significant; (*) is a significant difference at (typically p < 0.05). (*) and (**) are higher levels of significance (e.g., p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively)

Melanocytes were observed in low numbers within the stratum basale of the back, neck, and thorax regions and in high numbers in the abdomen and limb regions (Fig. 6). The abdomen had the highest melanocyte count, with significant differences when compared to the neck, back, and thorax. Moreover, the neck region had the lowest count (Fig. 6). No significant differences were observed among limb, back, and thorax, suggesting similar melanocyte counts in these regions (Fig. 6).

Discussion

The donkey has gained great attention due to the most cost-effective sources of transport and its ability to tolerate drought conditions. Some economic problems were linked to this species, such as decreasing their number compared to the rising demand for donkey hide in the Chinese market. The epidermal layer, with its cornified epithelium outer covering, provided skin strength and resistance against scraped areas, while the delineated squamous epithelium inner coating provided protection.

The current findings reveal that the epidermal part at the top of the apices of the dermal papillae gave rise to various villous protrusions in the dermis, giving rise to a serrated appearance in the abdomen, back, and neck regions. Our findings reveal the histomorphological characteristics of five different regions of Equus asinus skin using both appropriate staining techniques for light microscopy and precise identification by TEM microscopy, yielding a great deal of new data, including collagen content in donkey’s skin and skin thickness in various regions. Initially, the donkey’s skin is composed of two layers, the epidermis and dermis. The skin epidermis is composed of four layers, comprising the stratum corneum, stratum basale, stratum spinosum, and stratum granulosum, such as those of a horse [16, 24], Brandt’s hedgehog [8], Bakerwali goat [25], and ostrich [26], whereas the epidermis of the pigs has a three-layered epidermis: stratum germinativum, stratum granulosum, and stratum corneum, with the absence of stratum lucidum [27, 28], and also the deer has only three layers [29]. However, according to Hanafy, et al. [30], the domestic pig’s epidermis comprises four layers: stratum corneum, stratum granulosum, stratum spinosum, and stratum basale.

Melanocytes, a type of cell in the basal layer of the epidermis, are found in various parts of the body, including hair follicles, sebaceous and sweat gland ducts, and the superficial dermis, produce the skin and hair coloring pigment melanin [31]. In this study, melanocytes are observed in a low number within the stratum basale of the back, neck, and thorax regions and a high number in the abdomen and limb regions, and this is inconsistent with the finding of Sathapathy, et al. [32] that the zebra’s limb region has the highest amount of melanin deposition, followed by the abdomen and thighs. The current findings reveal that the basal cells in the epidermal part atop the apices of the dermal papillae give rise to various villous cytoplasmic protrusions in the dermis, giving rise to a serrated appearance in the abdomen, back, and neck regions. These dermal papillae name the papillomatous epidermis are also described in numerous animal species such as donkey, buffalo, pig, camels, sheep, and dog, but really observed in cow and goat [33]. The current findings concludes that the dermo-epidermal interface has a wavy form with well-defined columns of dermis protruding in-between dermal papillae, while Tong, et al. [34] described them as rete ridges.

Further, the dermis has been differentiated into an outer, thinner papillary layer and an inner, thicker reticular layer, which constitute the superficial dermis and deep dermis, respectively. These findings are consistent with those recorded in horses [16, 35, 36], donkeys, buffalo, cows, pigs, camels, sheep, goats, and dogs [33], and cattle [37]. It is also noted that the skin has a dermis, which is composed of fibers that give the skin its elasticity and support for surrounding tissues [16, 38]. In particular, our study recorded three fibrous layers of the dermis, comprising the papillary layer, reticular layer, and cordovan layer. The current findings are in harmony with Jorgensen, et al. [16] who mentioned that below the reticular dermis is a cordovan layer, but collagen becomes thicker, forming the third accessory layer. The current findings indicate the presence of a parallel, deeper, denser collagen layer (the third dermal layer) in the limb named the accessory Cordovan layer, and this is similar to the observations stated by Wakuri, et al. [35], Ahmed, et al. [39] in the horse. This cordovan layer gives the (horse mirror) appearance of skin, as reported by Talukdar, et al. [40].

In this study, the hair follicles have an oval shape, but in contrast, they have a rectangular shape in Indian bison [41], but generally they are observed in an oval shape in cows and goats [33, 42]. Primary follicles in buffalo, cattle, horses, and goats are arranged in linear rows, randomly distributed in pigs, and compound-type in capsular form in dogs [43]. The current findings reveal that the sweat glands are found in the central part of the reticular layer or deeper. These sweat glands are also observed in different animal species: donkeys, buffalo, pigs, camels, sheep, goats, and dogs, but are really observed in cows and goats [33]. On the contrary, the sweat glands are not detected in the zebras’ skin, as reported by Shambhulingappa, et al. [41]. Additionally, Yang, et al. [44] found that the sweat glands in yaks’ skin are poorly developed. The number of sweat glands varies greatly between regions, indicating a role in thermoregulatory evaporative cooling, particularly in hot climates [45], besides participating in transdermal drug delivery [46].

The current findings found that the arrector pili muscle is a small smooth muscle bundle near the beginning of the epidermis, and then at the sebaceous gland, it is divided into as many branches similar to those reported in the horse by Talukdar, et al. [40] and in different animal species such as donkeys, buffalo, pigs, camels, sheep, goats, and dogs, but are really observed in cows and goats [33]. In the dermal papillary layer, the arrector pili muscles are typically located around the hair follicle and are always linked to the sebaceous gland [47]. In cold weather, the contraction of these muscle fibers traps air inside the coat through the elevated hair, insulating the body [32]. They also stimulate other secretion products in the secretion channel. Our findings found simple, branched sebaceous glands in the dermis’ reticular layer, with a multi-bubble cytoplasm and central nuclei, and sebaceous glands with sacculations accompanying oval-shaped hair follicles in various anatomical regions, similar to that described in some animal species such as donkeys, buffalo, cows, pigs, camels, sheep, goats, and dogs [33]. Meanwhile, the nose of Brandt’s hedgehog has more sebaceous glands than any other area, but none are present in the cloak area [8].

In the present study, we initially measured the epidermal and dermal thickness in various areas of the skin of the donkey. The thinnest skin is observed at the limb, while the thickest skin is at the back, which corresponds to equine skin, as evidenced by [35], Volkering [48], and as previously mentioned in Yak by [44], Zhang [49]. This is a result of the back being the body part most exposed to storms, snowfall, and rainfall. In the trunk, the thickness of the donkey skin decreased from the dorsal to the ventral. The majority of domesticated large animals exhibited this pattern of variation in skin thickness, as stated by Danny [50]. On the other hand, the epidermis and dermis of the limb in zebras are thicker when compared with the abdomen [32].

The current findings reveal that the dermal-epidermal junction of the back skin of the donkey is significantly longer than that of the other skin regions examined. This is significant because the dermo-epidermal interface facilitates a strong connection between the epidermis and the dermis and ensures a foundation for re-epithelialization during wound healing, helping to maintain barrier function either to or from the epidermis [51].

Collagen constitutes a significant portion of the epidermis, and variations in its thickness with age have been linked to the amount of collagen in the skin [33, 52]. According to our current investigation, the collagen fibers’ crisscrossing in the third layer of the dermis may have a remarkable supporting role in the elastic rebound mechanism. This redirects the stores and lowers the amount of energy used for movement [53]. The variation in the thickness, extent, and pigmentation patterns of the skin and the distribution of skin appendages in various body areas led to the uniqueness of this species of animal.

Another unique aspect of the current study is the inclusion of ultra-structural observation of the skin of Equus asinus. Generally, awareness of the average thickness of a donkey’s skin and collagen contents may be helpful in collecting skin grafts for leather production and the cosmetics industry, respectively. Furthermore, these results are helpful for better understanding and appreciating the adaptability features of donkey skin.

Conclusion

From the current investigation, it can be concluded that the thinnest skin is the skin at the limb, while the thickest one is at the back, in addition to the presence of a third accessory layer in the skin of the donkey’s limb called the accessory Cordovan layer. Moreover, it was noted that the skin of the thoracic region contains a high percentage of collagen, but it is not significant. The study explores the ultra-structural composition of donkey skin, offering insights into its resilience to environmental conditions and potential biomedicine applications, benefiting various industries and research fields related to Equus asinus.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Al-Salihi KA, Farhat SF. The society for the protection and welfare of donkeys and mules in Egypt SPWDME: an overview. MRSVA. 2014;33(3):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khaleel AG, Lawa LA, Hassan NM, Abdu AM, Salisu MI, Kamarudin AS. Morphometric characterization of donkeys (Equus asinus) in D/Kudu Kano state for selective breeding and genetic conservation. J Agrobiotechnology. 2020;11(2):12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lizarraga I, Sumano H, Brumbaugh GW. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic differences between donkeys and horses. Equine Vet. Ed. 16(2):102–112. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2004.tb00275.x. equine vet educ. 2004;16(2):102–112.

  4. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization. Available online. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. 2016.

  5. DoF. Donkeys for Africa Taking a Stance against the Skin Trade; Available online: www.donkeysforafrica.orgIn.; 2017.

  6. Matlhola DM, Chen R. Telecoupling of the trade of Donkey-Hides between Botswana and China: Chal-lenges and opportunities. Sustainability. 2020;12(5):17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roger M, Fullard N, Costello L, Bradbury S, Markiewicz E, O’Reilly S, Darling N, Ritchie P, Maatta A, Karakesisoglou I, et al. Bioengineering the microanatomy of human skin. J Anat. 2019;234:438–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bazm MA, Goodarzi N, Abumandour MMA, Naseri L, Hosseinipour M. Histological characterisation of the skin of the Paraechinus hypomelas, Brandt, 1836 (Erinaceidae: Eulipotyphla). Folia Morphol. 2020;79(2):280–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kandyel RM, Elwan MM, Abumandour MM, El Nahass EE. Comparative ultrastructural-functional characterizations of the skin in three reptile species; chalcides ocellatus, uromastyx aegyptia aegyptia, and psammophis schokari aegyptia (FORSKAL, 1775): adaptive strategies to their habitat. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84:2104–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szczepanik MP, Wilkołek PM, Pluta M, Adamek Ł, Goły´nski M, Pomorski ZJ, Sitkowski W. The examination of biophysical skin parameters (transepidermal water loss, skin hydration and pH value) in different body regions in Polish ponies. Pol J Vet Sci. 2013;16(4):741–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Widelitz RB, Xin JT, Alexandra IV, Sheree A, Berreth FYT, Sung H, Chuong CM. Molecular histology in skin appendage morphogenesis. Microsc Res Tech. 1997;38:452–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Genkovski D, Gerche G. Study of the skin histological structure in Ewes from Staroplaninska and thorough bred Tsigai. Biotechnol Anim Husb. 2007;23(5–6):191–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y, Zhao Y, Lei C, Zhu F. Antiviral and antitumor activities of the protein fractions from the larvae of the housefly, musca domestica. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(39):9468–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sona P, Maya S, Lucy KM, Sreeranjini AR, Indu VR, Sumena KB, Sunilkumar NS, Annie VR, Abhin Raj KP. Estimation of hydroxy proline and collagen content in skin of Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). J Veterinar Anim Sci. 2020;51(1):79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Radhakrishnan R, Ghosh P, Selvakumar TA, Shanmugavel M, Gnanamani A. Poultry spent wastes: an emerging trend in collagen mining. Adv Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2020;6(2):26–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.15406/atroa.2020.06.00113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorgensen E, Lazzarini G, Pirone A, Jacobsen S, Miragliotta V. Normal microscopic anatomy of equine body and limb skin: A morphological and immunohistochemical study. Ann Anat. 2018:205–12.

  17. Lin Y, Kuan C. Development of 4-hydroxyproline analysis kit and its application to collagen quantification. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;119(3):1271–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Suvarna KS, Layton C, Bancroft JD. Bancroft’s theory and practice of histological techniques E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. Eighth Edition edn; 2019.

  19. Kandyel RM, El Basyouny HA, Albogami B, Madkour NF, Abumandour MMA. Comparative ultrastructural study of the oropharyngeal cavity roof in Tarentola annularis and heremites vittatus: to special reference to palate adaptation with feeding habits. Zool Anz. 2024;308:57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Masson P, Masson P, Masson P. Some histological methods: trichrome staining and their preliminary technique. 1929.

  21. Massoud D, Fouda M, Shaldoum F, Alrashdi BM, AbdRabou MA, Soliman SA, Abd-Elhafeez HH, Hassan M, Abumandour MMA. Characterization of the small intestine in the Southern White-breasted Hedgehog (Erinaceus concolor) using histological, histochemical, immunohistochemical, and scanning electron microscopic techniques. Microsc Microanal. 2023;29(6):2218–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kandyel RM, El Basyouny HA, El Nahas EE, Madkour F, Haddad S, Massoud D, Morsy K, Madkour N, Abumandour MMA. A histological and immunohistochemical study on the parabronchial epithelium of the domestic fowl’s (Gallus Gallus domesticus) lung with special reference to its scanning and transmission electron microscopic characteristics. Microsc Res Tech. 2022;85(3):1108–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Obayes AK. Histological study for skin of horse. Tikrit J Pure Sci. 2016;21(1):31–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Razvi R, Suri S, Sarma K, Sharma R. Histomorphological and histochemical studies on the different layers of skin of Bakerwali goat. J Appl Anim Res. 2015;43(2):208–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mansoori FS, Dehyadegari S, Mohtadi M. Histological study of ostrich skin after biopsy. Iranial J Veterinary Sci. 2013;8(1):53–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marcarian HQ, Calhoun ML. Microscopic anatomy of the integument of adult swine. Am J Vet Res. 1966;27(118):765–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vardaxis NJ, Brans TA, Boon ME, Kreis RW, Marres LM. Confocal laser scanning microscopy of Porcine skin: implications for human wound healing studies. J Anat. 1997;190(4):601–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagaraju CS, Prasad RV, Jamuna KV, Ramkrishna V. Histomorphological features in the differentiation of skin of spotted deer (Axis axis), cattle (Bos indicus) and goat (Capra hircus). Indian J Vet Anat. 2012;24(1):10–2.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hanafy BG, Abumandour MMA, Massoud E, Morsy K, El-kott A, Bassuoni NF. Snout cutis of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus, Linnaeus, 1758): using light and transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech. 2022;85(3):948–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scott DW, Miller WH. Equine dermatology-E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.

  32. Sathapathy S, Mishra UK, Sahoo N, Bhuyan C. Histological, histomorphometrical and histochemical studies on the skin of zebra (Equus caballus). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5(6):773–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mohammed ES, Madkour FA, Zayed M, Radey R, Ghallab A, Hassan R. Comparative histological analysis of the skin for forensic investigation of some animal species. EXCLI J. 2022;21:1286–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tong L, Stewart M, Johnson I, Richard A, Bethany W, James O, Johnson C, McGreevy PA. Comparative Neuro-Histological assessment of gluteal skin thickness and cutaneous nociceptor distribution in horses and humans. Animals. 2020;10(11):2094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wakuri H, Mutoh K, Ichikawa H, Liu B. Microscopic anatomy of equine skin with the special reference to the dermis. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1995;72(2–3):177–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scott DW, Miller WM. Skin immune system and allergic Scott, D.W., Miller, W.M, editors: Equine Dermatology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders. 1–34:436–440, 446–448.; 2003.

  37. Samuelson DA. Textbook of veterinary histology; 2007.

  38. Abdo JM, Sopko NA, Milner SM. The applied anatomy of human skin: a model for regeneration. Wound Med. 2020;28:100179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahmed W, Kulikowska M, Ahlmann T, Lise C, Berg LC, Adrian P, Harrison AP, Elbrønd VS. A comparative multi-site and whole-body assessment of fascia in the horse and dog: a detailed histological investigation. J Anat. 2019;235:1065–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Talukdar AH, Calhoun ML, Stinson AW. Microscopic anatomy of the skin of the horse. Am J Vet Res. 1972;33(12):2365–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shambhulingappa YB, Prasad RV, Jamuna KV, Narayanaswamy HD, Narayana BM, Ramkrishna V. Histological characteristics of hair follicle pattern in Indian Bison (Bos gaurus), Black buck (Antelope cer-vicapra) and Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus). Vet World. 2014;7:189–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kapadnis P, Bhosle N, Mamade C. Study on connective tissue fibre in neck skin of goat. Indian J Anim Res. 2005;39(1):60–2.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Raghav S, Uppal V, Gupta A. Comparative distribution of hair follicles in skin of different domestic animals. Haryana Vet. 2020;59(2):245–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yang X, Cui Y, Yue J, He H, Yu C, Liu P, Liu J, Ren X, Meng Y. The histological characteristics, age-related thickness change of skin, and expression of the HSPs in the skin during hair cycle in Yak (Bos grunniens). PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0176451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Abdou ASA, Guirgis RA, El-Ganaieny MM. Some histological changes in the hair and skin follicles of dromedary camels at different ages. Alex J Agric Res. 2006;51(2):17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Palmer BC, DeLouise LA. Nanoparticle-enabled transdermal drug delivery systems for enhanced dose control and tissue targeting. Molecules. 2016;21(12):1719.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kapadnis PJ, Bhosle NS. Microscopic anatomy of the integument of Osmanabadi goat. Indian Vet J. 2004;81:912–4.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Volkering ME. Variation of skin thickness over the equine body and the correlation between skin fold measurement and actual skin thickness. Doctoral thesis, University of Wageningen. https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/4003 2009.

  49. Zhang RC. Effects of Environment and Management on Yak Reproduction. In: Recent Advances in Yak Reproduction, eds. by Zhao, X.X. and Zhang. R.C., International Veterinary Information Service, Ithaca, New York.; 2000.

  50. Danny WS. Large animal dermatology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Haschek WM, Rousseaux CG, Wallig MA, Bolon B, Ochoa R. Haschek and Rousseaux’s Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology (Third Edition) Boston, MA: Academic Press. 2219–2268.; 2013.

  52. Shuster S, Black MM, McVitie E. The influence of age and sex on skin thickness, skin collagen and density. Br J Dermatol. 1975;93:639–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schleip R, Zorn A, Klingler W. Biomechanical properties of facial tissues and their role as pain generators. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2020;18(4):393–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria N. International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature and authorized by the general assembly of the world Association of veterinary Anatomist. Knoxville, 6th edition (Revised version); Ghent. Published by the Editorial Committee Hanover (Germany), Ghent (Belgium), Sapporo (Japan), Columbia, MO (U.S.A.), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). 2017.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Alexandria and Benha Universities for their help in completing this work. Also, we thank the Science, Technology, and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with the Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB) for their support in publishing this article.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Open access funding is provided by the Science, Technology, and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with the Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). The current study has not received any funds from any organizations or institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.M., Yasmeen Magdy. A.A.A., Ahmed Abo-Ahmed. M.A., Mohamed Abumandour. A. El-S., Anwar El Shafey. R. El-K., Reda El-Kammar. O.A., M.AL-M., Mai A. AL-Mosaibih, E.F., Eman Fayad, Osama Ahmed. Conceptualization by Y.M., M.A., A.A.A., and O.A.; Methodology by Y.M., M.A., O.A., and R. El-K.; Validation, investigation, and interpretation by M.A., A. El-S., and Y.M.; figure preparation by A.A.A., R. El-K., and M.A.; statistical analysis is prepared by M.AL-M. and E.F.; writing original draft preparation by Y.M., R. El-K., M.A., and O.A.; manuscript reviewing and editing by A.A.A., M.A., O.A., M.AL-M., E.F., and Y.M. All authors have reviewed the published version of the manuscript and given their approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abumandour.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Benha University and the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines in Egypt under the Animal Ethics number (Ethical No. BUFVTM 12-02-22), which accepted all procedures used in this study. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. We confirmed that all owners had given their informed consent for the use of these donkeys in our study. Additionally, we obtained ethical approval from our institution’s animal care committee prior to conducting any research involving the donkeys. This ensured that all necessary precautions were taken to prioritize the well-being of the animals throughout the study. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations from the Basel Declaration and the International Council for Laboratory Animal Science (ICLAS). The nomenclature used in this study was in accordance with Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria [54].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Animal ethics declaration

All methods were carried out in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Benha University and the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines in Egypt under the Animal Ethics number (Ethical No. BUFVTM 12-02-22), which accepted all procedures used in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magdy, Y., Abo-Ahmed, A., Abumandour, M. et al. Elucidation of collagen content in different anatomical regions of the dermis of donkeys (Equus asinus): histomorphometric and ultrastructural study. BMC Vet Res 21, 310 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12917-025-04712-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12917-025-04712-0

Keywords