Skip to main content

Comparative physiological and immunological impacts of Moringa oleifera leaf and seed water supplements on African catfish (Clarias gariepinus): effects on disease resistance and health parameters

Abstract

This study evaluated the differential effects of Moringa oleifera leaf and seed powders (0.8 g/L) as water supplements on the physiological and immunological responses of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) over six weeks. Leaf supplementation enhanced growth performance (final weight: 120.5 ± 0.7 g & gain% 65.2) and disease resistance, while seed supplementation elicited adverse physiological outcomes. Fish treated with seed powder exhibited reduced growth performance (gain % 11.2), elevated stress markers (glucose: 113.3 ± 3.8 mg/dL; cortisol: 27.4 ± 1.3 μg/dL), and compromised liver function (ALT: 30.2 ± 1.1 U/L; AST: 53.0 ± 1.6 U/L), evident through histological changes. Both treatments modulated immune responses, significantly upregulating pro-inflammatory serum cytokines (TNF-α, IL- 1β, IL- 6) and increasing gene expression in kidney and spleen tissues, with seeds group showing more pronounced elevations (TNF-α: 4.15-fold, IL- 1β: 3.15-fold in spleen) compared to moderate increases in leaves group (TNF-α: 2.48-fold, IL- 1β: 1.62-fold). Oxidant/antioxidant analysis revealed contrasting effects: leaf treatment enhanced superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) and reduced lipid peroxidation, malondialdehyde (MDA), while seed treatment compromised SOD defense and increased oxidative biomarker (MDA). Upon challenge with Aeromonas hydrophila, leaf-treated fish maintained 100% survival, while seed-treated and control groups showed 85% and 60% survival rates, respectively. These findings underscore the potential of M. oleifera leaf powder as an effective water supplement for enhancing growth and disease resistance in aquaculture, while cautioning against the use of seed powder due to its adverse physiological effects.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) stands as one of the most economically significant freshwater aquaculture species globally [27]. Widely cultivated across Africa, Asia, and parts of Europe, African catfish plays a vital role in food security and livelihood generation, particularly in developing countries [17]. In Egypt, the aquaculture sector has experienced remarkable growth in recent decades, with C. gariepinus emerging as a key species due to its rapid growth rate [25]. However, despite its potential, African catfish production in Egypt has fluctuated, with data from the General Fisheries Authority for Resources Development showing a decline from 13,622 tons in 2012 to 8,475 tons in 2019 [29]. As intensive aquaculture practices expand to meet rising global protein demands, effective fish health management has become critical for sustainable production [15]. In this context, natural feed additives have garnered increasing attention as sustainable alternatives to synthetic supplements, offering potential benefits for enhancing fish health and disease resistance [2].

Among these natural additives, Moringa oleifera Lam., commonly known as the "miracle tree" or "drumstick tree," has gained significant interest in aquaculture due to its multifaceted benefits [30]. Native to northern India and Pakistan, M. oleiferais now widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions [55]. Its leaves are particularly valued for their exceptional nutritional profile, containing substantial amounts of proteins (26.62%), essential amino acids, vitamins, minerals, and bioactive compounds such as flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol), phenolic acids (chlorogenic acid, gallic acid), and glucosinolates, which exhibit antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties [32, 37]. Water-soluble compounds in Moringa leaves, particularly benzyl isothiocyanate derived from glucosinolates, have demonstrated potent antimicrobial effects against aquatic borne pathogens, making them a promising candidate for water supplementation in aquaculture systems [56]. Additionally, Moringa seeds contain cationic proteins and polyelectrolytes that function as natural coagulants, potentially improving water clarity and reducing pathogen loads [63]. These multifunctional properties suggest that Moringa supplements could simultaneously enhance water quality parameters while delivering immunostimulatory compounds directly to fish through their gill surfaces and mucous membranes [61].

In contrast, the seeds, while beneficial for their natural coagulation properties and water purification potential [9], pose significant risks at high concentrations due to anti-nutritional factors and toxicity [38, 42]. Studies have shown that excessive use of M. oleifera seed powder can lead to fish mortality, with reported 96 h LC50 values of 124.0 mg/L in Cyprinus carpio [38]. This toxicity is attributed to compounds such as glucosinolates, phytates, saponins, and tannins, which can disrupt fish physiology and metabolism [48]. Exposure to seed extracts has been linked to hematological alterations, including reduced red blood cell counts, hemoglobin levels, and hematocrit values, indicating potential anemic conditions [1]. Furthermore, high concentrations of seed extracts can induce stress responses, alter enzyme activities, and inhibit growth rates [48].

The immune system of teleost fish relies heavily on cytokine-mediated responses to combat pathogens [36]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin- 1 beta (IL- 1β), and Interleukin- 6 (IL- 6) play pivotal roles in regulating inflammatory responses and enhancing disease resistance [64]. Dietary interventions using M. oleifera leaves offer promising opportunities to modulate these immune responses while avoiding the risks associated with seed supplements. Oxidative stress, a common challenge in intensive aquaculture systems, arises from an imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and antioxidant defenses [16]. Key oxidative stress markers, including Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) activity and Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, provide valuable insights into fish health and the efficacy of dietary interventions [66]. The natural antioxidants in M. oleifera leaves may help maintain oxidative homeostasis under intensive farming conditions [44].

One of the most pressing challenges in freshwater aquaculture is the threat posed by Aeromonas hydrophila, a highly destructive bacterial pathogen responsible for Motile Aeromonad Septicemia (MAS), which can cause mortality rates exceeding 80% during severe outbreaks [40, 58, 59]. The pathogen's ubiquity and increasing antibiotic resistance underscore the urgent need for effective prophylactic strategies that reduce reliance on antimicrobials [3, 60]. The intensification of catfish farming has highlighted the need for sustainable water supplements that enhance fish health performance [22]. Conventional water quality management often relies on chemical treatments that may accumulate in tissues, promote resistant pathogens, or cause environmental degradation [43]. This has spurred interest in plant-derived bioactive compounds that improve water quality, boost immunity, and protect against pathogens without harmful residues [6].

Despite the growing body of research on natural feed additives in aquaculture, significant knowledge gaps remain. While most studies have focused on M. oleiferaas a dietary supplement [19, 45], limited research has explored its application as a water supplement, particularly the comparative effects of leaves versus seeds [18, 38]. Studies by Abouzied et al. [7] demonstrated improved water quality with M. oleifera extracts, while Rapatsa and Moyo [53] found that higher dosages of seed powder induced adverse effects, including histological alterations, hematological disruptions, and reduced growth in tilapia. Comprehensive studies examining the simultaneous effects of M. oleifera leaves and seeds on physiological, immunological, and disease-resistance parameters in African catfish are scarce, and the mechanisms underlying their modulation of immune responses and oxidative status remain poorly understood.

This study aimed to address these gaps by evaluating and comparing the effects of aqueous supplementation with M. oleifera leaf and seed powder on physiological parameters (liver and kidney functions), hematological indices (WBCs, PCV), stress indicators (glucose, cortisol), immune responses (TNF-α, IL- 1β, IL- 6),antioxidant/oxidative stress markers (SOD, MDA), and histopathological changes in African catfish. Additionally, the study investigated the potential of leaf supplementation to enhance resistance against A. hydrophila infection, providing insights into natural strategies for sustainable disease management in aquaculture.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

The experiment was conducted at the Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (VET-CU-IACUC- 13102024982) and adhered to international guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Moringa oleifera processing

M. oleifera leaf and seed powders were sourced from the Scientific Society of Moringa (National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt). The leaves were washed with deionized water, air-dried under controlled conditions (25 ± 2 °C), and ground using an electric grinder (Moulinex, Grenoble, France). The resulting powder was sieved (60-mesh) to ensure uniform particle size [47]. On the other hand, moringa seeds were sorted, dehulled, and oven-dried at 50 °C for 10 h, following the method of Ijarotimi et al. [35] with minor modifications for aquafeed applications. The dried seeds were ground and sieved in the same manner as the leaves. Both powders were then stored in airtight containers and were sealed with aluminum foil until required.

Experimental fish management

Adult African catfish (C. gariepinus) were purchased from a private fish farm in Kafr El Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, with an initial average body weight of 85.67 ± 3.2 g and length of 24.33 ± 0.5 cm. The fish were transported alive to laboratory facilities in oxygenated plastic bags in dark containers with minimal stress. Fish were acclimated for two weeks in glass aquarium (60 × 30 × 30 cm, 45 L capacity), equipped with continuous aeration and filled with dechlorinated tap water, and maintained under controlled conditions: temperature (24–26 °C), dissolved oxygen (6.5 ± 0.5 mg/L), and pH (7.2 ± 0.2). A 12:12 h light: dark photo period was maintained, and water quality was preserved by performing 40% water exchanges every other day.

Experimental design

After acclimation, 135 fish were randomly assigned to three groups (GP1, GP2, GP3), with three replicates (15 fish per aquarium). All experimental groups received a basal diet; GP1 served as the control group, while GP2 and GP3 were additionally water supplemented with 0.8 g/L of M. oleifera leaf and seed powders, respectively, added after each water exchange. The selected concentration of 0.8 g/L was based on previous optimization studies demonstrating maximum efficacy for water purification [18]. Throughout the six-week experimental period, the experimental fish were fed a commercial diet (28% crude protein, Skretting, El Sharqia Governorate, Egypt) twice daily at 3% of their body weight, with feed amounts adjusted based on biomass. The uneaten feed was removed for one-hour post-feeding. Fish behavior and health were monitored daily, and water quality parameters were recorded throughout the study.

Blood sample collection

At the end of the six-week study, fish were fasted for 24 h before blood sample collection. From each experimental group, five fish were randomly collected from each replicate aquarium (total n = 15 per treatment group) for analysis. For biochemical and hematological analyses, five fish from each treatment group were used, with each fish representing one biological replicate. Fish were anesthetized using benzocaine solution (100 mg/L) before blood collection. Blood samples were drawn from the caudal vein using sterile syringes. The blood was then divided into two portions for different analyses. For hematological analysis, blood was collected into EDTA tubes. For serum biochemical analysis, blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulants. These samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and the serum was stored at − 80°C until further analysis [26].

Hematological and biochemical analysis

Hematological parameters, including PCV and WBC counts, were measured using standard methods for fish [28]. For biochemical analysis, commercial kits (Bio Diagnostic Co., Egypt) were used along with a Jasco-V530 UV–VIS spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). Liver function was assessed by measuring alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities, as described by Reitman and Frankel [54]. Kidney function was evaluated by measuring creatinine using the Jaffe reaction [33] and urea using the urease-GLDH enzymatic UV test [52]. Stress indicators, including serum glucose and cortisol levels, were measured using the GOD-PAP method [65] and a colorimetric assay [57], respectively.

Oxidant/antioxidants analysis

Antioxidant enzyme analysis was conducted by measuring superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity using the phenazine methosulphate-mediated reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium dye at 560 nm [50]. The oxidative stress biomarker, lipid peroxidation, was evaluated by measuring malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) method with absorbance measured at 532 nm [51].

Proinflammatory cytokine analysis

Proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL- 1β, IL- 6) in the serum were quantified using ELISA kits (Bio Diagnostic Co., Egypt) and expressed in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL), as described by Hanington and Belosevic [31].

Histological analysis

Fish were euthanized using benzocaine solution at a concentration of 300 mg/L for 10 min, followed by decapitation to ensure death, following the guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association [11]. We collected tissue samples from the head kidney, spleen, liver, intestine, gills, and accessory respiratory organ through careful dissection. The collected tissues were processed in two ways: one portion was preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histological examination following standard protocols [14], while the other portion was flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and maintained at− 80 °C for subsequent gene expression analysis.

Gene expression analysis

Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of kidney and spleen tissues using the GeneJET RNA purification kit (Fermentas, UK), and RNA quality was verified via Nanodrop spectrophotometry (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% agarose, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 2 μg of total RNA was mixed with 1 μL of oligo(dT)20 primers (50 μM) and 1 μL of dNTP mix (10 mM each), brought to a volume of 13 μL with nuclease-free water, and incubated at 65 °C for 5 min. After cooling on ice, 4 μL of 5 × First-Strand Buffer, 1 μL of DTT (0.1 M), 1 μL of RNaseOUT, and 1 μL of Superscript II RT were added. The reaction was incubated at 42 °C for 50 min, followed by inactivation at 70 °C for 15 min. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using a Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). Each reaction mixture (20 μL total volume) contained 10 μL SYBR Green Master Mix, 0.6 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM) for the target genes (IL- 1β and TNF-α) and the reference gene (β-actin), as listed in Table 1, μL cDNA template, and nuclease-free water. The thermal cycling conditions were programmed as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 45 s, and extension at 74 °C for 10 s. A melting curve analysis (65–95 °C with 0.5 °C increments) was performed to confirm amplification specificity. The relative expression levels of the target genes (IL- 1β and TNF-α) were normalized to the reference gene (β-actin) and calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method [41], with results expressed as fold changes relative to the control group.

Table 1 Primers used for gene expression analysis

Experimental challenge with A. hydrophila

After 6 weeks of aqueous exposure to M. oleifera powders, all fish were fasted for 24 h before challenge initiation. A virulent strain of A. hydrophila (T11201), obtained from the Department of Aquatic Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, was used for the challenge study. The strain was molecularly characterized by gyrB gene sequencing (OL321922.1) and confirmed positive for virulence genes including hemolysin (hlyA), aerolysin (aer), lipase (lip), and cytotonic heat-stable enterotoxin (ast) [21]. For challenge preparation, bacterial cultures were grown on tryptic soy agar for 24 h at 28 °C, then harvested and suspended in sterile physiological saline (0.85% NaCl). The bacterial suspension was adjusted spectrophotometrically at 600 nm wavelength and confirmed by plate counting to achieve a final concentration of 1.0 × 106CFU/mL, representing a sub-lethal dose based on preliminary LD50 trials [5]. For the challenge experiment, 60 fish in total were used (20 fish per treatment group, in three replicate tanks). The experimental design included both a negative control (non-infected fish) and a positive control (infected fish without prior Moringa treatment). Fish in each group were divided as follows: (1) Control group: 10 fish received sterile saline (negative control) and 10 fish received bacterial suspension (positive control); (2) Leaves-treated group (GP2): all 20 fish received bacterial suspension; and (3) Seeds-treated group (GP3): all 20 fish received bacterial suspension. All injections were administered intraperitoneally at a volume of 0.2 mL. Clinical signs, behavior, and mortality were monitored for 14 days post-challenge. Pathogen-specific mortality was confirmed via bacterial re-isolation, and cumulative survival rates were calculated.

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). Normality was verified using Shapiro–Wilk’s test. One-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple range test compared treatment effects. Results were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE), with significance set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Fish weight and clinical observations

Moringa leaves enhanced growth performance while seeds reduced growth and induced adverse clinical signs in treated catfish. Final weight was monitored over six weeks in the three treatment groups (Table 2). Starting from similar initial weights (80.0–81.0 g), both control and Moringa leaves groups showed significant growth (P ≤ 0.05), reaching 109.0 ± 5.4 g and 120.5 ± 0.7 g, respectively, while the Moringa seeds group showed reduced growth (91.5 ± 17.2 g). Clinical observations remained normal in both control and leaves-treated groups, while the seeds group exhibited adverse effects including reduced appetite, skin discoloration, hyperemia, and exophthalmia (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Growth performance and clinical observations in african catfish during 6-Week treatment period
Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical signs observed in African catfish (C. gariepinus) after 6 weeks of exposure to M. oleifera seeds treatment: (a) body showing growth retardation and skin discoloration with patchy depigmentation (long arrow), and (b) head region exhibiting exophthalmia (short arrow) and hyperemia

Hematological and biochemical responses

Both Moringa treatments increased white blood cell counts, with seeds causing significant elevations in liver and kidney function markers and stress indicators, while leaves produced minimal changes.

Hematological analysis revealed differential responses among treatment groups (Table 3). PCV values showed no differences between treated groups compared to control (P ≤ 0.05), while WBC counts increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) in both Moringa-treated groups compared to the control (9.53 ± 1.03 × 103 cells/mm3), with the seeds group showing the highest elevation (11.07 ± 1.23 × 103 cells/mm3), followed by the leaves group (10.63 ± 0.29 × 103 cells/mm3).

Table 3 Physiological Parameters in African Catfish After 6 Weeks of Moringa Treatments

Significant alterations were observed in liver function markers in the seeds group, with ALT and AST levels significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) compared to control, while leaves treatment resulted in slight elevations (Table 3). Similarly, kidney function markers (creatinine and urea) and stress indicators (glucose and cortisol) were significantly increased in the seeds group (P ≤ 0.05), while the leaves group showed minor changes compared to control values (Table 3).

Stress indicator analysis revealed a similar pattern, with the seeds group exhibiting significant increases (P ≤ 0.05) in both glucose and cortisol levels compared to control values, while the leaves group-maintained stress indicators near control levels in both parameters (Table 3).

Oxidant/antioxidant response

Moringa treatments produced opposite effects on oxidative status, with leaves enhancing antioxidant activity while seeds compromised oxidative defenses. Oxidative/ antioxidant parameters showed significant changes in both treatment groups but in opposite directions (Table 3). SOD activity increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) in the leaves group but decreased significantly in the seeds group compared to control. MDA levels showed a similar pattern of significant changes (P ≤ 0.05), with marked elevation in the seeds group and significant reduction in the leaves group compared to control.

Serum cytokine response

Both Moringa treatments upregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines, with seeds inducing more pronounced inflammatory responses than leaves. Cytokines showed significant changes (P ≤ 0.05) in both treatment groups, with more pronounced elevations in the seeds group (Table 3). TNF-α, IL- 1β, and IL- 6 levels were significantly increased in both Moringa-treated groups compared to their level in control group, with the seeds group consistently showing higher cytokine elevations than the leaves group. This pattern of differential cytokine upregulation suggests a stronger inflammatory response in seed-treated fish compared to leaf-treated fish.

Gene expression analysis of IL- 1β and TNF-α

RT-PCR revealed significant upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes in both treatment groups, with seeds inducing higher expression levels than leaves across three time points (2, 4, and 6 weeks).

RT-PCR analysis revealed significant upregulation of IL- 1β and TNF-α in kidney and spleen tissues across both treatment groups, with more pronounced effects in the seeds group (Fig. 2). Gene expression was analyzed at three points (2, 4, and 6 weeks) to monitor the progression of immunomodulatory effects. In kidney tissue at week 6, IL- 1β expression showed significant elevation (P ≤ 0.05) in both seeds (2.85-fold) and leaves (1.48-fold) groups, with the seeds group showing more pronounced elevation. Similarly, TNF-α expression patterns showed significant upregulation with greatest effects observed at week 6, where seeds treatment induced 2.65-fold increase in kidney and 4.15-fold increase in spleen, compared to moderate increases in the leaves group (1.55-fold in kidney and 2.48-fold in spleen).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL- 1β and TNF-α mRNA in kidney and spleen tissues of C. gariepinus exposed to M. oleifera treatments over 6 weeks. Asterisks indicate significant differences from control group (*P ≤ 0.05). a IL- 1β expression in kidney showing maximum upregulation (2.85-fold) in seeds treatment at week 6. b IL- 1β expression in spleen reaching 3.15-fold increase in seeds treatment. c TNF-α expression in kidney demonstrating 2.65-fold increase with seeds treatment. d TNF-α expression in spleen showing highest upregulation (4.15-fold) among all tissues

Histological findings

Histological examination revealed treatment-specific tissue responses, with both Moringa treatments inducing immunological activation while seeds caused more pronounced changes in immune-related organs. Histological examination revealed distinct tissue responses across treatment groups (Figs. 3 and 4). In liver sections, control fish (Fig. 3a, H&E, × 200) displayed normal hepatic architecture with well-defined hepatocytes arranged in cords around central veins. The leaves-treated group maintained similar normal architecture (Fig. 3b, H&E, × 200) with intact hepatocytes and sinusoids. In contrast, the seeds-treated group (Fig. 3c, H&E, × 200) exhibited notable alterations including focal lymphoid aggregation, mild vacuolation of hepatocytes, and occasional pyknotic nuclei indicating early degenerative changes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparative histological analysis of liver, kidney, and spleen tissues from African catfish (C. gariepinus) after 6-week exposure to Moringa treatments (H&E staining). Liver sections showing: (a) normal histological structure with intact central vein and hepatocytes in control group, (b) normal liver architecture in leaves-treated group, and (c) focal lymphoid aggregation in parenchyma (arrow) in seeds-treated group. Kidney sections showing: (d) normal glomeruli and tubules in control group, (e) massive lymphoid aggregation (arrow) and focal hemorrhages in leaves-treated group, and (f) lymphoid hyperplastic proliferation between tubules and glomeruli in seeds-treated group. Spleen sections showing: (g) normal lymphoid structure with melanin pigmentation (arrow) in control group, (h) lymphoid proliferation in follicles (arrow) in leaves-treated group, and (i) diffuse lymphoid proliferation (arrow) in follicles in seeds-treated group. Hematoxylin and eosin stain (X 200)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparative histological analysis of intestine, gills, and accessory respiratory organ of African catfish (C. gariepinus) after 6-week exposure to Moringa treatments (H&E staining). Intestinal sections showing: (a) normal mucosal layer with intact epithelium and lamina propria of villi in the control group, (b) normal intestinal architecture in leaves-treated group, and (c) preserved intestinal structure in seeds-treated group (X 200). Gill sections showing: (d) normal filaments and lamellae structure in the control group, (e) normal gill architecture in leaves-treated group, and (f) preserved gill organization in seeds-treated group (X100). Accessory respiratory organ sections showing: (g) normal parenchymal and stromal structure in the control group, (h) normal architecture in leaves-treated group, and (i) preserved tissue organization in seeds-treated group (X200)

Kidney sections from control fish (Fig. 3d, H&E, × 200) showed normal nephrons with well-defined glomeruli and tubules. The leaves-treated group (Fig. 3e, H&E, × 200) demonstrated significant immune cell infiltration with massive lymphoid aggregation between glomeruli and tubules and focal haemorrhages, indicating active immune responses without structural damage. Seeds-treated fish (Fig. 3f, H&E, × 200) displayed more pronounced changes, including lymphoid hyperplastic proliferation, tubular epithelial degeneration, and increased Melano macrophage centres, suggesting both immune activation and mild nephrotoxicity. Splenic tissue from control fish (Fig. 3g, H&E, × 200) exhibited normal white and red pulp organization with characteristic melanin pigmentation. Leaves-treated fish (Fig. 3h, H&E, × 200) showed marked lymphoid proliferation in follicles with enlarged white pulp areas, indicating immunostimulant. Seeds-treated spleen (Fig. 3i, H&E, × 200) demonstrated diffuse lymphoid proliferation, hemosiderin deposition, and expanded Melano macrophage centers, suggesting more intense immune activation with possible haemolytic effects.

In contrast, digestive and respiratory organs maintained normal architecture across all treatment groups (Fig. 4). The intestinal tissue showed normal histological structure of the mucosal layer with intact lining epithelium and underlying lamina propria of the villi in control (Fig. 4a, H&E, × 200), leaves-treated (Fig. 4b, H&E, × 200), and seeds-treated groups (Fig. 4c, H&E, × 200). Similarly, gill tissue displayed normal histological organization of filaments and lamellae across control (Fig. 4d, H&E, × 100), leaves-treated (Fig. 4e, H&E, × 100), and seeds-treated groups (Fig. 4f, H&E, × 100). The accessory respiratory organ maintained normal parenchymal and stromal structure in control (Fig. 4g, H&E, × 200), leaves-treated (Fig. 4h, H&E, × 200), and seeds-treated fish (Fig. 4i, H&E, × 200), with no treatment-related alterations observed.

Challenge test with A. hydrophila

Moringa leaves provided complete protection against A. hydrophila challenge (100% survival), while seeds offered intermediate protection (85% survival) compared to control fish (60% survival). Following the six-week exposure period, fish were challenged with A. hydrophila to evaluate disease resistance (Fig. 5). Clinical signs appeared within 24 h post-challenge, with fish exhibiting reduced feeding activity and erratic swimming behaviour. The control group showed the most severe clinical manifestations, including haemorrhages, skin hyperemia, epidermal erosion, and ulcerative lesions. Mortality in the control group began 48 h post-challenge and progressively increased, reaching a cumulative mortality rate of 40% by day fourteen, with survival rate declining to 60% by the end of the observation period.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Survival rates of C. gariepinus challenged with A. hydrophila (1.0 × 106 CFU/mL) after six weeks of exposure to different treatments. Control group showed progressive mortality reaching 40% by day fourteen, while Moringa leaves-treated group maintained 100% survival throughout the observation period. The Moringa seeds-treated group showed intermediate protection with 85% survival. Fish monitored for 14 days post-challenge

Fish exposed to Moringa leaves demonstrated superior disease resistance, maintaining a significantly higher survival rate (P ≤ 0.01) compared to both control and seeds groups, with 100% survival throughout the 14-day post-challenge period. These fish exhibited minimal clinical signs, primarily limited to temporary reduction in feeding activity during the first 72 h post-challenge. This enhanced disease resistance correlates with the observed immunostimulatory effects, including elevated WBC counts, balanced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, and enhanced antioxidant status in the leaves-treated group.

The Moringa seeds group showed intermediate resistance to A. hydrophila infection, maintaining 85% survival by day fourteen. Clinical signs in this group were moderate, including scattered haemorrhagic spots and mild fin erosion. While the severity of symptoms was significantly lower compared to the control group, the reduced survival rate compared to the leaves group may be attributed to the physiological stress and compromised antioxidant status observed in these fish. Bacterial re-isolation confirmed A. hydrophila as the cause of mortality, with the highest bacterial loads recovered from control group tissues, while significantly lower counts are observed in surviving fish from both Moringa treatment groups (P < 0.05).

Discussion

This study provides comprehensive insights into the physiological and immunological effects of M. oleifera leaves and seeds supplements on African catfish (C. gariepinus), revealed a complex interplay between immune activation and potential toxicity. The novel approach of water supplementation, as opposed to traditional dietary inclusion methods [19, 22], has unveiled distinct response patterns in immune stimulation and organ function that warrant careful consideration for aquaculture applications. The findings demonstrate significant differences between leaves and seeds treatments, with leaves promoting beneficial effects, while seeds exhibited potential toxicological concerns at the tested concentrations.

The growth performance results revealed a significant impact of M. oleiferasupplementation. While the control group showed steady growth (109.0 ± 5.4 g), the leaves treated group demonstrated the highest growth performance (120.5 ± 0.7 g), suggesting potential growth-promoting effects. This improvement may be attributed to the exceptional nutritional composition of Moringa leaves, which contain 23–30% crude protein, 5.9% crude fiber, 7.6–12% ash, and 7.09% crude lipid in their dried form, providing essential macronutrients necessary for tissue development and metabolic functions [37, 55, 62]. In contrast, the seeds treated showed reduced growth (90.5 ± 17.2 g) and clinical abnormalities, aligning with previous studies reporting growth inhibition in fish exposed to high concentrations of Moringa seeds extracts [1, 12]. This growth suppression may be linked to the presence of antinutritional factors in Moringa seeds, such as glucosinolates, phytates, and tannins, which can interfere with nutrient absorption and metabolic processes [48]. These compounds may inhibit digestive enzymes or bind essential nutrients, reducing their bioavailability and leading to impaired growth [46].

The hematological analysis revealed notable variations in immune response parameters across treatment groups. The marked increase in white blood cell (WBC) counts, particularly in the seeds treated group (11.07 ± 1.23 × 103 cells/mm.3), suggests a strong immunostimulatory effect, consistent with the findings that Moringa can modulate immune responses [10, 44]. However, such immune activation may come at a physiological cost, especially in the seed-treated group. While elevated WBC counts in both treatment groups reflect enhanced immune responses [36], the more pronounced elevation in the seeds group, coupled with increased stress markers, suggests a stress-induced immune response rather than beneficial immunostimulant. This could indicate the intricate relationship between stress and the immune system and ensure that the immune system is being overactivated, potentially leading to chronic immune exhaustion, which is proud with the finding of [8].

The biochemical analysis revealed significant hepatic and renal responses to Moringa treatments. While the leaves group showed non-significant slight elevations in liver enzymes, the seeds group demonstrated marked increases in ALT (30.2 ± 1.1 U/L) and AST (53.0 ± 1.6 U/L) compared to the control, suggesting potential hepatocellular injury [23, 38]. Similarly, kidney function markers showed only slight increases in the leaves group but significant elevation in the seeds group. These findings align with Abbas & El-Badawi [1], who reported similar hepatic dysfunction in fish exposed to high concentrations of Moringa seeds extracts. In contrast, the minimal elevation of these enzymes in the leaves group may indicate a more balanced physiological response, related to enhanced metabolic activity rather than tissue damage.

The stress response analysis provided crucial insights into the physiological impact of Moringa supplementation. The seeds group showed significant increases in both glucose (113.3 ± 3.8 mg/dL) and cortisol (27.4 ± 1.3 μg/dL), while the leaves group exhibited only slight, non-significant elevations (glucose: 76.9 ± 3.4 mg/dL, cortisol: 15.3 ± 1.0 μg/dL), suggesting a more balanced physiological response [67]. The minimal increases observed in the leaves group might represent an adaptive response rather than chronic stress, as supported by the better survival rates and disease resistance in this group.

On the other hand, the oxidative stress parameters revealed contrasting effects between leaves and seeds treatments. Moringa leaves supplementation resulted in enhanced antioxidant defense, as evidenced by increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (15.1 ± 0.5 U/mL), consistent with other studies showing the antioxidant properties of Moringa [20, 36]. The lower SOD levels in seeds treated fish (7.4 ± 0.6 U/mL) and the accompanying increase in lipid peroxidation (MDA: 27.2 ± 1.0 nmol/mL) suggest that the seeds may compromise antioxidant defense, contributing to oxidative stress, possibly due to the pro-oxidant effects of certain seeds components at higher concentrations. This result supports the findings of [8, 39], who observed that excessive immune activation could impair antioxidant mechanisms, leading to oxidative damage. The hepatic and kidney stress responses, combined with oxidative damage (indicated by increased MDA levels), suggest that while Moringa seeds offer water purification benefits, their bioactive compounds may stress vital organs when used over extended periods [12, 38].

In seeds treated fish, the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF-α (4.15-fold in the spleen) and IL- 1β (3.15-fold in the spleen), underscores a potent immunostimulatory response. Elevated cytokine levels have shown to correlate with tissue damage and metabolic stress [13]. While indicating immune activation, this inflammatory response may contribute to physiological strain, as evidenced by the increased glucose and cortisol levels, which suggest metabolic disruption. The moderate increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL- 1β, IL- 6) in the leaves group suggests enhanced immune preparedness without excessive inflammation, supporting the findings of [8, 64] regarding balanced cytokine responses in fish.

The histological findings provided structural evidence supporting biochemical and immunological observations. Histological analysis further supports this interpretation, with seeds treatment leading to extensive lymphoid proliferation in the spleen and kidney, indicating systemic immune activation beyond beneficial levels. Similar findings have been reported in studies using plant-based supplements, where immune stimulation could lead to unintended tissue stress [13]. The enhanced lymphoid proliferation in immunological tissues of leaves treated fish, without considerable damage to other organs, suggests beneficial immunomodulation. This agrees with Abdel-Latif et al. [3] observations regarding the immunostimulatory effects of moringa leaves.

Notably, the most significant finding was the enhanced disease resistance against A. hydrophila challenge in the leaf-treated group, demonstrated by a 100% survival rate and minimal clinical signs. This superior protection may be attributed to the combination of enhanced immune responses and maintained physiological homeostasis, supporting the potential of moringa leaves as a natural immunostimulant in aquaculture. This supports the growing body of literature highlighting the potential of Moringa as a natural disease resistance enhancer [20, 24]. The leaves treatment achieved this enhanced resistance without the accompanying physiological stress seen with seeds, making it a safer and more sustainable option for aquaculture applications.

The superior health outcomes observed in fish treated with Moringa leaves may be attributed to multiple physiological mechanisms. Enhanced antioxidant status, evidenced by increased SOD activity (15.1 ± 0.5 U/mL) and reduced lipid peroxidation (MDA: 12.1 ± 0.4 nmol/mL), likely results from the synergistic action of polyphenolic compounds including quercetin, kaempferol, and chlorogenic acid, which activate nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathways [34]. Moderate upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α: 2.48-fold, IL- 1β: 1.62-fold in spleen) observed in leaves treated fish suggests activation of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway at levels sufficient to prime immune responses without inducing inflammatory damage [8, 68]. This balanced immune activation is mediated by isothiocyanates and other glucosinolate-derived compounds that modulate macrophage activity and cytokine production. This multi-target mechanism explains why leaf treatment conferred complete protection against A. hydrophila challenge while maintaining physiological homeostasis.

In conclusion, while Moringa seeds possess powerful immunostimulatory properties, their use as water supplements requires careful consideration due to the potential for toxicity. These findings concise with previous studies [12, 38], underscoring the need for a balanced approach when using natural supplements in aquaculture. Moringa leaves present a safer and more effective alternative, offering robust immune stimulation without significant organ stress, suggesting their potential as sustainable health promoters in aquaculture systems. Future studies should focus on optimizing application methods and concentrations for Moringa leaves while exploring improved extraction methods for seeds to maximize benefits and minimize toxicity. Additionally, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the differential effects of leaves and seeds could lead to the development of more effective and environmentally sustainable disease management strategies in aquaculture, contributing to the industry's sustainable growth.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Abbas H, El-Badawi A. Use of haematological and biochemical parameters and histological changes to assess the toxicity of drumstick tree (Moringa oleifera) seeds extract on Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fish. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. 2014;18(3):21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abd El-Naby AS, El Asely AM, Hussein MN, Khattaby AERA, Sabry EA, Abdelsalam M, Samir F. Effects of dietary fermented Saccharomyces cerevisiae extract (Hilyses) supplementation on growth, haematology, immunity, antioxidants, and intestinal health in Nile tilapia. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):12583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdel-Latif HM, Abdel-Daim MM, Shukry M, Nowosad J, Kucharczyk D. Benefits and applications of Moringa oleifera as a plant protein source in Aquafeed: A review. Aquaculture. 2022;547: 737369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdel Rahman NA, Mansour DA, Abd El-Rahman GI, Elseddawy NM, Zaglool AW, Khamis T, Mahmoud SF, Mahboub HH. Imidacloprid toxicity in Clarias gariepinus: Protective role of dietary Hyphaene thebaica against biochemical and histopathological disruption, oxidative stress, immune genes expressions, and Aeromonas sobria infection. Aquaculture. 2022;555: 738170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdel-Razek, N., Awad, S. M., & Abdel-Tawwab, M. (2019). Effect of dietary purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) leaves powder on growth, immunostimulant, and protection of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus against Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 45(6), 1907–1917.

  6. Abdel-Tawwab M, Mounes HA, Shady SH, Ahmed KM. Effects of yucca, Yucca schidigera, extract and/or yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as water additives on growth, biochemical, and antioxidants/oxidant biomarkers of Nile tilapia. Oreochromis niloticus Aquaculture. 2021;533: 736122.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abouzied A, Radwan TE, Hanan ASH. Applying Moringa oleifera Extract in Water Treatment as a Natural Coagulant to Remove Turbidity and Algae. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish. 2023;27(5):1121–31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21608/ejabf.2023.323750.

  8. Amna A. Immunology of stress: A review Article. J Clin Med. 2024;13(21):6394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alam MW, Pandey P, Khan F, Souayeh B, Farhan M. Study to investigate the potential of combined extract of leaves and seeds of Moringa oleifera in groundwater purification. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Majali IS, Al-Oran SA, Hassuneh MR, Al-Qaralleh HN, Rayyan WA, Al-Thunibat OY, Mallah E, Abu-Rayyan A, Salem S. Immunomodulatory effect of Moringa peregrina leaves, ex vivo and in vivo study. Central European Journal of Immunology. 2017;42(3):231–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. AVMA, (2007). Guidelines on Euthanasia (Formerly the Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia). Available online. http://www.avma.org/issues/animal_welfare/euthanasia.pdf.

  12. Ayotunde, E. O., Fagbenro, O. A., Adebayo, O. T., & Amoo, A. I. (2004). Toxicity of aqueous extracts of drumstick Moringa oleifera seeds to Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus, fingerlings and adults. In Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Tilapia.

  13. Baloch AA, Abdelsalam EEE, Piačková V. Cytokines studied in carp (Cyprinus carpio L) in response to important diseases. Fishes. 2022;7(1):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bancroft, J. D., & Gamble, M. (Eds.). (2008). Theory and practice of histological techniques (pp. 80–84). Elsevier Health Sciences.

  15. Basry DM, Mansour S, Sayed AEDH. Dietary Moringa oleifera mitigates Fluconazole-Induced immunological and spleen-histological alterations in Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). BMC Vet Res. 2024;20(1):325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Biller JD, Takahashi LS. Oxidative stress and fish immune system: phagocytosis and leukocyte respiratory burst activity. An Acad Bras Ciênc. 2018;90:3403–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dauda AB, Salele HA, Orimogunje OG. Influence of feeding frequency and feeding time on growth performance and feed utilisation of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell 1822) fingerlings. Niger J Anim Prod. 2022;49(1):169–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Desta WM, Bote ME. Wastewater treatment using a natural coagulant (Moringa oleifera seeds): optimization through response surface methodology. Heliyon. 2021;7(11): e08374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elabd H, Soror E, El-Asely A, Abd El-Gawad E, Abbass A. Dietary supplementation of Moringa leaf meal for Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus: Effect on growth and stress indices. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 2019;45(3):265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Hadary AE, Ramadan MF. Antioxidant traits and protective impact of Moringa oleifera leaf extract against diclofenac sodium-induced liver toxicity in rats. J Food Biochem. 2019;43(2): e12704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elgendy, M. Y., Abdelsalam, M., Kenawy, A., & Younis, N. A. (2024). Phenotypic, genotypic and virulence traits analysis of aeromonads causing massive mortality in farmed Oreochromis niloticus. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists, 44(2).

  22. El-Kassas S, Abdo SE, Abosheashaa W, Mohamed R, Moustafa EM, Helal MA, El-Naggar K. Growth performance, serum lipid profile, intestinal morphometry, and growth and lipid indicator gene expression analysis of mono-sex Nile tilapia fed Moringa oleifera leaf powder. Aquaculture Reports. 2020;18: 100422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Kassas, S., Aljahdali, N., Abdo, S. E., Alaryani, F. S., Moustafa, E. M., Mohamed, R., ... & Conte-Junior, C. A. (2022). Moringa oleifera leaf powder dietary inclusion differentially modulates the antioxidant, inflammatory, and histopathological responses of normal and Aeromonas hydrophila-infected mono-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 918933.

  24. El Shanawany EE, Fouad EA, Keshta HG, Hassan SE, Hegazi AG, Abdel-Rahman EH. Immunomodulatory effects of Moringa oleifera leaves aqueous extract in sheep naturally co-infected with Fasciola gigantica and Clostridium novyi. J Parasit Dis. 2019;43(4):583–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Sayed EH, El-Demerdash AS, Elamin AM, Yusuf MS. Impacts of fish meal replacement with fermented animal by-products in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) diets on growth, body composition, and fish quality. Assiut Vet Med J. 2020;66(164):24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Emam MA, Shourbela RM, El-Hawarry WN, Abo-Kora SY, Gad FAM, Abd El-latif AM, Dawood MA. Effects of Moringa oleifera aqueous extract on the growth performance, blood characteristics, and histological features of gills and livers in Nile tilapia. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2024;9(1):85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. FAO (2023) Statistical query panel - global production by production source. In: FAO fisheries and aquaculture division. Rome. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics-query/en/global_production. Accessed 21 Dec 2023

  28. Feldman, B. F., Zinkl, J. G., & Jain, N. C. (2000). Schalm's veterinary haematology (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  29. GAFRD. Fish Statistics Yearbook (2019) Egypt: general authority for fish resources. Ministry of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt: Ministry of Agriculture Publications; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gopalakrishnan L, Doriya K, Kumar DS. Moringa oleifera: A review on nutritive importance and its medicinal application. Food Sci Human Wellness. 2016;5(2):49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanington, P. C., & Belosevic, M. (2007). Interleukin-6 family cytokine M17 induces differentiation and nitric oxide response of goldfish (Carassius auratus L.) macrophages. Developmental & Comparative Immunology, 31(8), 817–829.

  32. Hassan MF, El Zohairy NF, Abd El Monsef AG, El_Tahawy, S. N., Elshafey, W. S., Elmesalamy, S. M., … & Mansour, M. K. Efficacy of Moringa oleifera, lactoferrin and Syner-tox in counteracting aflatoxin effects in broiler chickens. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research. 2024;14(7):1173–81.

  33. Henry, R. J. (1974). Clinical chemistry, principles and techniques (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.

  34. Hussain Y, Khan H, Alsharif KF, Hayat Khan A, Aschner M, Saso L. The therapeutic potential of kaemferol and other naturally occurring polyphenols might be modulated by Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway: Current status and future direction. Molecules. 2022;27(13):4145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ijarotimi OS, Fatiregun MR, Oluwajuyitan TD. Nutritional, antioxidant and organoleptic properties of therapeutic-complementary-food formulated from locally available food materials for severe acute malnutrition management. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2022;46(1):39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kamble, M. T., Gallardo, W., Salin, K. R., Pumpuang, S., Chavan, B. R., Bhujel, R. C., ... & Pirarat, N. (2024). Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf extract on the growth performance, hematology, innate immunity, and disease resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) against Streptococcus agalactiae biotype 2. Animals, 14(6), 953.

  37. Kashyap P, Kumar S, Riar CS, Jindal N, Baniwal P, Guiné RP, Correia PM, Mehra R, Kumar H. Recent advances in Drumstick (Moringa oleifera) leave bioactive compounds: Composition, health benefits, bioaccessibility, and dietary applications. Antioxidants. 2022;11(2):402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kavitha C, Ramesh M, Kumaran SS, Lakshmi SA. Toxicity of Moringa oleifera seed extract on some hematological and biochemical profiles in a freshwater fish. Cyprinus carpio Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology. 2012;64(7–8):681–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kozlov AV, Javadov S, Sommer N. Cellular ROS and antioxidants: Physiological and pathological role. Antioxidants. 2024;13:602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lisachov, A., Nguyen, D.H.M., Panthum, T., Ahmad, S.F., Singchat, W., Ponjarat, J., Jaisamut, K., Srisapoome, P., Duengkae, P., Hatachote, S. and Sriphairoj, K., 2023. Emerging importance of bighead catfish (Clarias macrocephalus) and north African catfish (C. gariepinus) as a bioresource and their genomic perspective. Aquaculture, 573, p.739585.

  41. Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods, 25(4), 402–408.

  42. Mahaveerchand H, Abdul Salam AA. Environmental, industrial, and health benefits of Moringa oleifera. Phytochem Rev. 2024;23:1497–556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mahmoud RH. Assessment of Phytoremediation Efficiency and Valuable Biomass-Yielding of Different Microalgal Strains Grown on Aquaculture Wastewater. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. 2024;28(2):883–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mansour AT, Espinosa C, García-Beltrán JM, Miao L, Ceballos Francisco DC, Alsaqufi AS, Esteban MÁ. Dietary supplementation of drumstick tree, Moringa oleifera, improves mucosal immune response in skin and gills of seabream, Sparus aurata, and attenuates the effect of hydrogen peroxide exposure. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2020;46:981–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mansour AT, Miao L, Espinosa C, García-Beltrán JM, Ceballos Francisco DC, Esteban MÁ. Effects of dietary inclusion of Moringa oleifera leaves on growth and some systemic and mucosal immune parameters of seabream. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2018;44:1223–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mehdi H, Khan N, Iqbal KJ, Rasool F, Chaudhry MS, Khan KJ. Effect of Moringa oleifera meal on the growth, body composition and nutrient digestibility of Labeo rohita. Int J Biosci. 2016;8(4):11–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mishra, P., Sharma, R. K., & Chauhan, N. (2023). Phytochemical analysis of ethyl acetate, methanol and aqueous extracts of Moringa oleifera leaves and seeds. Biochemical & Cellular Archives, 23(1).

  48. Moustafa B, Assem HED. Comparative physiological evaluation of the potential use of Moringa oleifera seeds or leaves as an alternative protein source for the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. 2024;28(1):1561–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nasrullah H, Yanti DH, Faridah N, Hardiantho D, Nababan YI, Sukenda S, Alimuddin A. Early immune gene development and expression in African catfish Clarias gariepinus after challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquacult Int. 2021;29(2):595–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nishikimi M, Rao NA, Yagi K. The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972;46(2):849–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979;95(2):351–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Patton CJ, Crouch SR. Urea colorimetric end point determination urease-berthelot reaction. Anal Chem. 1977;49:464–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Rapatsa MM, Moyo NAG. Effect of Moringa oleifera on the histology, haematology and growth of Oreochromis mossambicus in aquadams® fertilised with chicken manure in South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci. 2014;39(3):295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Reitman S, Frankel S. A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1957;28(1):56–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rhyem S. The Chemical Composition of Egyptian Moringa Oleifera Grown in Different Agro Ecological Regions. Journal of Advances in Agriculture. 2018;8(1):1467–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shailemo DH, Kwaambwa HM, Kandawa-Schulz M, Msagati TA. Antibacterial activity of Moringa ovalifolia and Moringa oleifera methanol, N-hexane and water seeds and bark extracts against pathogens that are implicated in water borne diseases. Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2016;6(2):71–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sink TD, Lochmann RT, Fecteau KA. Validation, use, and disadvantages of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for detection of cortisol in channel catfish, largemouth bass, red pacu, and golden shiners. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2008;34:95–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sherif AH, Okasha LA, Kassab AS, Abass ME, Kasem EA. Long-term exposure to lead nitrate and zinc sulfate Nile tilapia impacts the Aeromonas hydrophila treatment. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51:71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11033-023-09033-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Sherif, A.H., Gouda M.Y., Zommara M.A., Abd El-Rahim A.H., Mahrous K.F. and Abd-El halim Salama S.S. (2021). Inhibitory effect of nano selenium on the recurrence of Aeromonas hydrophila bacteria in Cyprinus carpio. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries 25(3):713–738. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21608/EJABF.2021.180901.

  60. Sherif, A.H., Alsokary, E.T. and Esam, H.A. (2019). Assessment of titanium dioxide nanoparticle as treatment of Aeromonas hydrophila infection in Oreochromis niloticus. Hellenic Vet. Med. SOC. 70(3): 1697–1706. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12681/jhvms.21796.

  61. Steinberg, C. E. (2024). Medicinal Plant Survey: ‘Good for Humans, Good for Fishes!” In Aquatic Animal Nutrition: Plant Preparations (pp. 49–137). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

  62. Su B, Chen X. Current status and potential of Moringa oleifera leaf as an alternative protein source for animal feeds. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Villaseñor-Basulto DL, Astudillo-Sánchez PD, Real-Olvera J, Bandala ER. Wastewater treatment using Moringa oleifera Lam seeds: a review. J Water Process Eng. 2018;23:151–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang J, Jia Z, Dang H, Zou J. Meteorin-like/Meteorin-β upregulates proinflammatory cytokines via NF-κB pathway in grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella. Dev Comp Immunol. 2022;127: 104289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wu, G., Yuan, C., Shen, M., Tang, J., Gong, Y., Li, D., ... & Han, X. (2007). Immunological and biochemical parameters in carp (Cyprinus carpio) after Qompsell feed ingredients for long‐term administration. Aquaculture Research, 38(3), 246–255.

  66. Zhang JD, Li HJ, Amenyogbe E, Wang WZ, Huang JS, Chen G. Cloning of Mn-SOD gene and its mRNA expression difference and antioxidant enzyme activities under hypoxia stress of cobia Rachycentron canadum. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(10):6897–909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zidan EM, Goma AA, Tohamy HG, Soliman MM, Shukry M. Insight study on the impact of different salinity levels on behavioural responses, biochemical stress parameters and growth performance of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Aquac Res. 2022;53(7):2750–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Zou J, Secombes CJ. The function of fish cytokines Biology. 2016;5(2):23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No external funding received.

STDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.G. G.: Writing – original draft, Performing experimental tests, Investigation, Data collection. N.A. Y: Writing –review & editing, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. S. Y. S.: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, writing. All authors have reviewed and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Howyda G. Gaber or Nehal A. Younis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

It is important to note that the fish samples used in this research are purchased, and therefore, no specific permissions were required for their collection. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (VET-CU-IACUC- 13102024982) and adhered to international guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaber, H.G., Younis, N.A. & Saleh, S.Y. Comparative physiological and immunological impacts of Moringa oleifera leaf and seed water supplements on African catfish (Clarias gariepinus): effects on disease resistance and health parameters. BMC Vet Res 21, 320 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12917-025-04717-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12917-025-04717-9

Keywords